Interactive Leadership Development Demonstration

Situational Leadership Style Selector

Match leadership direction and support to a follower's task-specific competence and commitment, then observe how changing readiness and execution pressure affects the recommended leadership approach.

Demonstration Overview

Lead the person for the task they are performing now.

The worked scenario involves a capable team member taking ownership of a high-value client transition. The selector diagnoses task-specific competence and commitment, recommends a leadership style, and overlays execution conditions such as criticality, time pressure, trust and leader availability.

Core Readiness Variables Competence + Commitment
Leadership Styles Directing · Coaching · Supporting · Delegating
Baseline Profile High competence · Very high commitment
Learning Pattern Manipulate → Observe → Explain → Challenge → Recommend
Guided Demonstration

Situational Leadership — Step by Step

Eight locked stages move from leadership context through competence, commitment and execution overlays, then apply a commitment shock before the final management review.

Current Stage 1 of 8
Recommended Style Not assessed
Progress Establish context
Learning stages
Foundation Stage 1 of 8

Establish the Leadership Context

Current Instruction
Interactive Leadership Dashboard

Follower Readiness and Leadership Style Fit

Reveal the leadership context to begin.

100%
Leadership status: Establish the situational leadership context.
Interpretation

Use competence and commitment for the style diagnosis; use execution conditions for oversight.

Directing

Higher direction and lower support. Most useful when task competence is low and the follower needs clear structure, priorities and next steps.

Coaching

Higher direction and higher support. Useful while competence is still developing and commitment or confidence is inconsistent.

Supporting

Lower direction and higher support. Useful when capability is substantial but confidence, motivation or ownership is variable.

Delegating

Lower direction and lower day-to-day support. Useful when competence and commitment are both high and the follower can own execution.

Core Style Fit is based on task-specific Competence and Commitment using an illustrative four-profile matching model.

Oversight Need uses Task Criticality, Time Pressure, Competence, Trust and Leader Availability to indicate how much assurance and checkpoint discipline may be prudent.

Execution Readiness summarizes Competence, Commitment, Trust and Leader Availability, adjusted for Criticality and Time Pressure.

Important: this is a custom educational adaptation for learning purposes, not a proprietary leadership assessment instrument. Use professional judgement and organizational context when applying the model.

Experiment Mode

Build Your Own Leadership Scenario

Experiment Mode is isolated from the guided demonstration. Adjust all six assumptions freely and observe how style fit and execution guidance change.

Check Your Understanding

Quick Knowledge Check

Choose an answer, then check it.
Quick Reference

Situational Leadership Cues

Diagnose the Task

Ask what the person is being asked to do now; do not diagnose readiness from job title alone.

Separate Competence and Commitment

A person can be highly capable and still need support when confidence, motivation or ownership changes.

Match Direction

Increase task direction when competence is low; reduce unnecessary direction as demonstrated capability grows.

Match Support

Increase listening, encouragement and involvement when commitment or confidence is variable.

Overlay Risk

Critical tasks may need stronger checkpoints and escalation even when the follower is ready for substantial autonomy.

Re-Diagnose

Readiness can change during execution. Adjust the leadership approach when competence, commitment or context changes.

Key Takeaway
Match leadership behaviour to the follower's readiness for the specific task—not to the leader's habitual style.

Use direction to build task capability, support to strengthen commitment, and autonomy when competence and commitment are both strong.